zhenbo

ISSN 2096-7780 CN 10-1665/P

杨小林, 杨锦玲, 危自根. 前驱波还是气压波?与“汶川MS8.0地震前山西前兆低频前驱波特征分析”作者商榷[J]. 地震科学进展 , 2021, (11): 522-527. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2021.11.006
引用本文: 杨小林, 杨锦玲, 危自根. 前驱波还是气压波?与“汶川MS8.0地震前山西前兆低频前驱波特征分析”作者商榷[J]. 地震科学进展 , 2021, (11): 522-527. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2021.11.006
Yang Xiaolin, Yang Jinling, Wei Zigen. Precursory or atmospheric waves?Comments on“Analysis of characteristics of precursor wave of low frequent in Shanxi before Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake” by Zhang et al (2009)[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 2021, (11): 522-527. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2021.11.006
Citation: Yang Xiaolin, Yang Jinling, Wei Zigen. Precursory or atmospheric waves?Comments on“Analysis of characteristics of precursor wave of low frequent in Shanxi before Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake” by Zhang et al (2009)[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 2021, (11): 522-527. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2021.11.006

前驱波还是气压波?与“汶川MS8.0地震前山西前兆低频前驱波特征分析”作者商榷

Precursory or atmospheric waves?Comments on“Analysis of characteristics of precursor wave of low frequent in Shanxi before Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake” by Zhang et al (2009)

  • 摘要: 2008年5月11日山西地区5个地壳形变测项出现了“前驱波”信号,但其真实的物理本质究竟如何?至今仍存质疑。为此,本文借助小波变换方法对气压波和“前驱波”在不同时、频段的相关性进行了较系统的诊断;还进一步将“前驱波”与短时气压波动所产生的干扰实例进行了对比分析。结果表明:这些“前驱波”并非源自汶川MS8.0地震,而主要是气压波动的干扰。

     

    Abstract: On May 11 2008, some“precursory waves”were obviously recorded at five stations in Shanxi Province, but their real physical nature is still under debate. To uncover these important phenomena, we adopt the wavelet transform method to diagnose the correlations between atmospheric and precursory waves at different frequency bands. Furthermore, we compare the typical variations induced by the fluctuations of atmospheric pressure to the “precursory waves”aiming to analyze the similarities between them. The results show that the physical origin of these “precursory waves”mainly comes from the atmospheric waves rather than from the Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake.

     

/

返回文章
返回