山东区域流体数据跟踪分析及思考

王西宝; 程树岐

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2021.09.003

山东区域流体数据跟踪分析及思考

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2021.09.003

王西宝^,,
程树岐

山东省地震局沂水地震台，山东沂水 276400

详细信息

通讯作者:
王西宝（1981-），男，工程师，主要从事地球物理观测及数据分析工作。E-mail：jiguanlang@vip.163.com

中图分类号: P315.63
计量
- 文章访问数: 129
- HTML全文浏览量: 129
- PDF下载量: 13
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-06-27
- 修回日期: 2021-08-29

Tracking analysis and thinking of underground fluid data in Shandong geophysical networks

Wang Xibao^,,
Cheng Shuqi

Yishui Seismic Station of Shandong Earthquake Agency，Yishui Shandong 276400，China

摘要

摘要: 介绍了山东地球物理台网地下流体测网及数据跟踪分析概况，对2017—2020年数据跟踪分析工作产出的6大类事件记录归纳和梳理，并对地球物理事件中的同震效应进行探讨。结果表明：影响山东流体跟踪分析质量的主要原因在于观测系统；跟踪分析中存在的质量问题可以通过相应措施加以解决；极少数水位观测井具有同震效应，多数观测井监测地壳应力变化的能力较弱。
- 地下流体 /
- 数据跟踪 /
- 典型事件 /
- 同震效应
Abstract: This paper first introduces the general situation about the underground fluid networks and data tracking analysis of Shandong geophysical networks. Then the records of six types of abnormal change events produced by data tracking and analysis work from 2017 to 2020 are summarized and sorted out and the co-seismic effect in geophysical events are analyzed. The results showed that: the main reason affecting the quality of fluid tracking analysis in Shandong Province lied in the observation system; the problems existing in the tracking analysis can be solved by corresponding measures; a few water level observation wells had co-seismic effect, and the ability of most observation wells to monitor crustal stress changes is gradually weakening.
- underground fluid /
- data tracking /
- typical events /
- co-seismic effect
注释:

1) ① 关于组织开展地震前兆台网观测数据跟踪简报编写工作的通知. 中震测函〔2012〕165号

2) ② 关于全面开展地震前兆台网数据跟踪分析工作的通知. 中震函〔2013〕311号

3) ① 山东省地球物理台网观测数据跟踪分析年报（2017、2018、2019、2020年）

4) ① 地震前兆数据跟踪分析描述事件要素标准（2版，2015年11月）

5) ① DB/T 20.1-2006地震台站建设规范. 地下流体台站. 第1部分：水位和水温台站

6) ① 山东省地球物理台网观测数据跟踪分析年报（2017、2018、2019、2020年）

7) ① 山东省地球物理台网观测数据跟踪分析年报（2017、2018、2019、2020年）

HTML全文

图 1 山东地下流体站点分布

Figure 1. Distribution of underground fluid stations in Shandong Province

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 2017—2020年事件统计图

Figure 2. Statistical chart of abnormal events from 2017 to 2020

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 观测系统事件事例

Figure 3. An example of observation system event

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 自然环境事件事例

Figure 4. An example of natural environmental event

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 场地环境事件事例

Figure 5. An example of field environmental event

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 人为干扰事件事例

Figure 6. An example of human-caused disturbance factors event

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 地球物理事件事例

Figure 7. An example of geophysical event

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 部分典型水位同震响应曲线

Figure 8. Co-seismic response curve of water level

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 2017—2020年事件统计

Table 1. Event statistics from 2017 to 2020

	事件类型
	观测系统	自然环境	场地环境	人为干扰	地球物理	不明原因
仪器/套	43	11	8	35	6	2
事件/条	514	72	15	205	17	4

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 井水位同震响应特征

Table 2. Co-seismic response characteristics of well water level

发震时刻	震级（M）	纬度/°N	经度/°E	参考位置	水位变化幅度/m	同震响应类型	备注
年-月-日时:分:秒	震级（M）	纬度/°N	经度/°E	参考位置	水位变化幅度/m	同震响应类型	备注
2017-01-22 12:30:25	7.9	−6.19	155.14	所罗门群岛	0.023	振荡型	鲁07井
2017-01-22 12:30:25	7.9	−6.19	155.14	所罗门群岛	0.03	振荡型	鲁09井
2017-07-18 07:34:13	7.8	54.36	168.95	科曼多尔群岛地区	0.063	振荡型	鲁09井
2017-09-08 12:49:15	8.2	15.05	−93.90	墨西哥沿岸近海	0.124	振荡型	鲁27井
2018-01-23 17:31:41	8.0	55.96	−149.13	阿拉斯加湾	0.05	振荡型	鲁09井
2018-01-23 17:31:41	8.0	55.96	−149.13	阿拉斯加湾	0.13	振荡型	鲁27井
2018-08-19 08:19:37	8.1	−18.08	−178.06	斐济群岛地区	0.028	振荡型	鲁09井
2019-05-26 15:41:12	7.8	−5.85	−75.18	秘鲁北部	0.029	振荡型	鲁27井
2020-03-25 10:49:19	7.5	48.93	157.74	千岛群岛	0.018	振荡型	鲁27井
2020-07-22 14:12:37	7.9	55.14	−158.59	阿拉斯加以南地区	0.04	振荡型	鲁27井
2020-10-20 04:54:36	7.7	54.73	−159.78	阿拉斯加半岛	0.021	振荡型	鲁27井

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(25)

[1]	李正媛,熊道慧,刘高川,等. 基于大数据挖掘的地震前兆台网观测数据跟踪分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2016,37(3):1-6 Li Zhengyuan,Xiong Daohui,Liu Gaochuan,et al. The application of large data mining techniques in earthquake precursory network observation data tracking analysis[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,2016,37(3):1-6
[2]	张明哲,王静,凌燕,等. 邢台地震台地下流体观测数据跟踪分析[J]. 高原地震,2020,32(1):39-44 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-586X.2020.01.006 Zhang Mingzhe,Wang Jing,Ling Yan,et al. Data tracking and analysis of the underground fluid in Xingtai seismic station[J]. Plateau Earthquake Research,2020,32(1):39-44 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-586X.2020.01.006
[3]	温丽媛,刘春国,陈其峰,等. 山东地震前兆台网地下流体数据跟踪分析[J]. 内陆地震,2019,33(2):166-173 Wen Liyuan,Liu Chunguo,Chen Qifeng,et al. Tracking analysis of underground fluid data in Shandong earthquake precursor network[J]. Inland Earthquake,2019,33(2):166-173
[4]	邵叶,刘锦,严兴,等. 广东省地下流体观测台网数据跟踪分析[J]. 防灾减灾学报,2019,35(3):78-83 Shao Ye,Liu Jin,Yan Xing,et al. Data tracking and analysis of the underground fluid observation network in Guangdong Province[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction,2019,35(3):78-83
[5]	任俊峰,郭亚亚,焦成丽,等. 承德地震前兆台网数据跟踪分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2019,40(1):79-84 Ren Junfeng,Guo Yaya,Jiao Chengli,et al. Data tracking analysis of Chengde seismic precursor networks[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,2019,40(1):79-84
[6]	潘洁,孙亮亮,李良辉,等. 五河女山井水温数据跟踪分析中的常见案例分析[J]. 国际地震动态,2019(3):15-18 Pan Jie,Sun Liangliang,Li Lianghui,et al. Analysis of some common breakdown of water temperature data in Nüshan,Wuhe well[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology,2019(3):15-18
[7]	周洋,罗棋,李查玮,等. 数字化地下流体观测仪器故障分析[J]. 地震科学进展,2020(3):25-29 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2020.03.003 Zhou Yang,Luo Qi,Li Chawei,et al. Failure analysis of digital underground fluid observation instrument[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences,2020(3):25-29 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2020.03.003
[8]	李慧,齐玉妍,王莉森,等. 浅析河北地壳形变数据跟踪分析典型事件[J]. 高原地震,2019,31(3):38-47 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-586X.2019.03.008 Li Hui,Qi Yuyan,Wang Lisen,et al. Study on typical events of crustal deformation data tracking and analysis in Hebei Province[J]. Plateau Earthquake Research,2019,31(3):38-47 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-586X.2019.03.008
[9]	刘川琴,李发,谢庆,等. 安徽省前兆数据异常跟踪深入分析研究[J]. 国际地震动态,2019(11):35-41 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4975.2019.11.006 Liu Chuanqin,Li Fa,Xie Qing,et al. Deep analysis and research on abnormal tracking of precursory data in Anhui Province[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology,2019(11):35-41 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4975.2019.11.006
[10]	李希亮,张玲,董晓娜,等. 山东区域地震前兆台网数据跟踪分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2016,37(5):142-146 Li Xiliang,Zhang Ling,Dong Xiaona,et al. The data tracking and analysis of earthquake precursor networks in Shandong Province[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,2016,37(5):142-146
[11]	董晓娜,张玲,李希亮,等. 山东地震前兆观测数据跟踪分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2018,39(5):87-95 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2018.05.013 Dong Xiaona,Zhang Ling,Li Xiliang,et al. Trace analysis on the observation data of earthquake precursory in Shandong Province[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,2018,39(5):87-95 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2018.05.013
[12]	董敏,张辉,马娟,等. 基于Android手机APP的地下流体水位校测表计算[J]. 地震科学进展,2021,51(7):326-329 Dong Min, Zhang Hui, Ma Juan, et al. Software for calibration and calculation of underground fluid water level based on Android mobile phone APP[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences,2021,51(7):326-329
[13]	张立,罗睿洁,高文斐,等. 云南地下流体对尼泊尔8.1级地震的同震响应特征分析[J]. 地震研究,2016,39(4):537-544 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2016.04.002 Zhang Li,Luo Ruijie,Gao Wenfei,et al. Analysis on coseismal response characteristic of underground fluid related to Nepal M8.1 earthquake in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,2016,39(4):537-544 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2016.04.002
[14]	张彬,刘耀炜,高小其,等. 2015年尼泊尔M_S8.1地震引起的井水位与井水温同震效应及其相关性分析[J]. 地震学报,2015,37(4):533-540 doi: 10.11939/jass.2015.04.001 Zhang Bin,Liu Yaowei,Gao Xiaoqi,et al. Correlation analysis on co-seismic response between well water level and temperature caused by the Nepal M_S8.1 earthquake[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,2015,37(4):533-540 doi: 10.11939/jass.2015.04.001
[15]	杨斐,张彬,杨选辉,等. 汶川8.0级和日本9.0级地震时甘肃境内井水位、井水温同震效应对比分析[J]. 中国地震,2013,29(3):377-385 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2013.03.009 Yang Fei,Zhang Bin,Yang Xuanhui,et al. Analysis on co-seismic responses of well water level and water temperature in Ganshu Province to the Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake and the Japan M_S9.0 earthquake[J]. Earthquake Research in China,2013,29(3):377-385 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2013.03.009
[16]	苏鹤军,曹玲玲,张慧,等. 近场水位、水温同震响应特征及对地震的预测[J]. 地震工程学报,2020,42(1):98-106 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2020.01.098 Su Hejun,Cao Lingling,Zhang Hui,et al. Co-seismic response characteristics of near-field water level and water temperature and associated prediction of earthquakes[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2020,42(1):98-106 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2020.01.098
[17]	胡小静,付虹,李涛,等. 云南普洱大寨井水位同震响应研究及预测意义[J]. 地震研究,2020,43(2):340-347 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2020.02.016 Hu Xiaojing,Fu Hong,Li Tao,et al. Study on co-seismic response and prediction significance of groundwater level in the Dazhai well[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,2020,43(2):340-347 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2020.02.016
[18]	刘凯,张辉,张军,等. 山东省井水位对几次大地震同震响应的比较分析[J]. 地震学报,2019,41(1):69-79 doi: 10.11939/jass.20170161 Liu Kai,Zhang Hui,Zhang Jun,et al. Comparative analysis on coseismic response of water level in Shandong Province to several major earthquakes[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,2019,41(1):69-79 doi: 10.11939/jass.20170161
[19]	刘春国,孔令昌,杨竹转,等. 我国地震井水位观测网监测效能评估[J]. 中国地震,2015,31(2):329-337 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2015.02.017 Liu Chunguo,Kong Lingchang,Yang Zhuzhuan,et al. Monitoring efficiency evaluation of well-water-level observation network in China[J]. Earthquake Research in China,2015,31(2):329-337 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2015.02.017
[20]	耿杰,陈安方,潘双进. 山东地下水动态观测井对2007年印尼8.5级地震的响应特征[J]. 西北地震学报,2008,30(2):173-178 Geng Jie,Chen Anfang,Pan Shuangjin. Responding characteristics of dynamic underground water in observation wells of Shandong Province to Indonesia M8.5 earthquake in 2007[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal,2008,30(2):173-178
[21]	冯恩国,连凯旋,陈其锋,等. 聊古一井水位同震效应研究[J]. 高原地震,2016,28(1):19-24 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-586X.2016.01.004 Feng Enguo,Lian Kaixuan,Chen Qifeng,et al. Study on the coseismic effect of the Liaogu-1 well[J]. Plateau Earthquake Research,2016,28(1):19-24 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-586X.2016.01.004
[22]	王学聚,殷海涛,王庆林. 山东地下流体数字化井网对特大地震的响应分析[J]. 国际地震动态,2017(10):32-39 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4975.2017.10.006 Wang Xueju,Yin Haitao,Wang Qinglin. The analysis on the response of Shandong underground fluid digitalized well network to great earthquake[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology,2017(10):32-39 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4975.2017.10.006
[23]	丁仁杰,黄才中,毛正毅,等. 深井水位记震特征研究[J]. 地震学刊,1988(4):36-46 Ding Renjie,Huang Caizhong,Mao Zhengyi,et al. Study on seismic recording characteristics of deep well water level[J]. Journal of Seismology,1988(4):36-46
[24]	Elkhoury J E,Brodsky E E,Agnew D C. Seismic waves increase permeability[J]. Nature,2006,441(7097):1135-1138 doi: 10.1038/nature04798
[25]	孙小龙,向阳. 基于同震水震波的水文地质参数求取方法探讨[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2018,45(3):22-29 Sun Xiaolong,Xiang Yang. A discussion of the method of estimating hydraulic parameters based on groundwater responses to seismic waves[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology,2018,45(3):22-29