zhenbo

ISSN 2096-7780 CN 10-1665/P

陈文彬, 宋毅盛, 李小军. 关于“滦县—乐亭断裂”的讨论[J]. 地震科学进展 , 2020, (7): 31-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2020.07.006
引用本文: 陈文彬, 宋毅盛, 李小军. 关于“滦县—乐亭断裂”的讨论[J]. 地震科学进展 , 2020, (7): 31-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2020.07.006
Wenbin Chen, Yisheng Song, Xiaojun Li. Discussion on the “Luanxian-Leting fault”[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 2020, (7): 31-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2020.07.006
Citation: Wenbin Chen, Yisheng Song, Xiaojun Li. Discussion on the “Luanxian-Leting fault”[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 2020, (7): 31-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-7780.2020.07.006

关于“滦县—乐亭断裂”的讨论

Discussion on the “Luanxian-Leting fault”

  • 摘要: 通过对近年来石油物探资料的分析,前人推断的“滦县—乐亭断裂”在昌黎断裂以东并不存在。经对“滦县—乐亭断裂”北段(本文称滦县西断裂)的野外地质调查和与乐亭断裂的对比分析,滦县西断裂和乐亭断裂为两条独立的断裂,二者在产状、性质、发育历史、构造部位、最新活动时代等方面均存在明显差别。滦县西断裂南端很可能终止于卢龙断裂上,深部呈“y”形相汇,二者共同构成1976年卢龙7.1级地震的发震构造。对乐亭断裂开展的浅层地震勘探表明,断裂上断点埋深279—612 m之间,第四纪早期可能有过活动,晚更新世以来没有活动。

     

    Abstract: “Luanxian-Leting fault”is an inferred fault. Recent petroleum geophysical data reveals that the “Luanxian-Leting fault”does not exist in the east of Changli fault. Based on the field geological investigation and comparative analysis of the northern segment of the“Luanxian-Leting fault”(in this paper, the West Luanxian fault) and the Leting fault, it is found that the West Luanxian fault and the Leting fault are two independent faults. There are obvious differences between them in the occurrence, property, development history, structural location and the latest activity. The southern end of the West Luanxian fault is likely to end on the Lulong fault, and the deep part is in the shape of “y” . Both of them constitute the seismogenic structure of the Lulong earthquake. The shallow seismic exploration of Leting fault shows that the depth of the upper breakpoint is between 279—612 m, which may have been active in the early Quaternary, but not since the late Pleistocene.

     

/

返回文章
返回