Discussion on the revision of Regulations on Seismic Safety Evaluation of Gansu Province
-
摘要: 自2015年 “放管服” 改革以来,地震安全性评价政策发生重大变化,地震安全性评价资质许可和结果审定等行政许可被取消,改为强制性评估,继而开展区域性地震安全性评价。国家层面的相关行政法规已于2017和2019年进行了两次修订。《甘肃省地震安全性评价管理条例》作为调整甘肃省地震安全性评价相关法律关系的专门性地方性法规,颁布距今已有15年之久,出现与上位法冲突、法律空白及法律滞后性明显等不适应经济社会发展的情形。本文从地方性法规修订的角度出发,阐述了修订的意义、修订应当把握的原则,并就明确地震安全性评价对象、部门职能职责权限、地震安全性评价范围、区域性地震安全性评价等制度方面提出具体建议,分析当前省级地震工作主管部门在修法及工作实践中存在的困境,提出相关建议。Abstract: Since the reform of “delegating power, delegating control and providing services” in 2015, seismic safety evaluation policies have undergone major changes. Administrative licenses such as qualification license and result review have been cancelled and replaced with mandatory evaluation, and then regional seismic safety evaluation has been proposed. The relevant administrative regulations at the national level have been revised twice in 2017 and 2019. It has been 15 years since the promulgation of the Regulations on Seismic Safety Evaluation of Gansu Province, which is a special local law to adjust the legal relations related to earthquake safety evaluation in Gansu Province, and there are obvious conflicts with higher law, legal blank and legal lag. This article bases on the perspective of local rules and regulations revision. It expounds the meaning, amending principle, and the specific functions of seismic safety evaluation object, department responsibility permissions, the range of seismic safety evaluation, regional system of seismic safety evaluation and other aspects. Meantime, it analyses the competent work department at the provincial level in the repairing laws and difficulties existing in the work practice. At last, it puts forward relevant suggestions.
-
Key words:
- seismic safety evaluation /
- local regulations /
- revision
-
[1] 张广萍. 《甘肃省地震防震减灾条例》修订工作解读与思考[J]. 城市与减灾,2022,14(3):58-62 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0495.2022.03.013Zhang G P. Interpretation and thought on the revision of Regulations on Earthquake Prevention and Disaster Reduction in Gansu Province[J]. City and Disaster Reduction,2022,14(3):58-62 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0495.2022.03.013 [2] 闪淳昌,周玲,秦绪坤,等. 我国应急管理体系的现状、问题及解决路径[J]. 公共管理评论,2020(2):5-20Shan C C,Zhou L,Qin X K,et al. The status quo and problems with and solutions to China’s national emergency management system[J]. China Public Administration Review,2020(2):5-20 [3] 钱淮云. 地震安全性评价管理工作中有关问题的讨论[J]. 国际地震动态,2015(8):21-26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0235-4975.2015.08.005Qian H Y. Discussion on the problems of seismic safety evaluation supervision[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology,2015(8):21-26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0235-4975.2015.08.005 [4] 郎爱云. 地震安全性评价改革之法律评析[J]. 经济法学评论,2016,16(1):282-293Lang A Y. Legal review on the reform of seismic safety evaluation[J]. Economic Law Review,2016,16(1):282-293 [5] 李蕾,聂冠军,杨钦杰,等. 区域性地震安全性评价目标区地震构造特征研究−以三江口港产城新区为例[J]. 华南地震,2022,42(1):45-51 doi: 10.13512/j.hndz.2022.01.07Li L,Nie G J,Yang Q J,et al. Research on the seismic structure characteristics of the target area of regional seismic safety evaluation:Taking Gangchancheng New District in Sanjiangkou as an example[J]. South China Journal of Seismology,2022,42(1):45-51 doi: 10.13512/j.hndz.2022.01.07 [6] 黎益仕, 张红, 余积明, 等. 地震安全性评价制度改革的问题与展望[J]. 震害防御技术, 2021, 16(4): 781-788Li Y S, Zhang H, Yu J M, et al. Problems and prospects of system reform in seismic safety assessment[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2021, 16(4): 781-788 -

计量
- 文章访问数: 94
- HTML全文浏览量: 26
- PDF下载量: 12