zhenbo

ISSN 2096-7780 CN 10-1665/P

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

中国大陆中强地震复发间隔的概率分布研究

邓世广

邓世广. 中国大陆中强地震复发间隔的概率分布研究[J]. 地震科学进展, 2022, (4): 161-167. doi: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2021-092
引用本文: 邓世广. 中国大陆中强地震复发间隔的概率分布研究[J]. 地震科学进展, 2022, (4): 161-167. doi: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2021-092
Deng Shiguang. Distribution research of recurrence interval for moderate-strong earthquake in the mainland of China[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 2022, (4): 161-167. doi: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2021-092
Citation: Deng Shiguang. Distribution research of recurrence interval for moderate-strong earthquake in the mainland of China[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 2022, (4): 161-167. doi: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2021-092

中国大陆中强地震复发间隔的概率分布研究

doi: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2021-092
基金项目: 中国地震局震情跟踪定向工作任务(2021010502)资助。
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    邓世广(1988-),男,副研究员,主要从事地震活动性分析工作。E-mail:dengsg@seis.ac.cn

  • 中图分类号: P315

Distribution research of recurrence interval for moderate-strong earthquake in the mainland of China

  • 摘要: 地震复发间隔的概率分布是计算地震发生概率的基础。利用我国历史地震目录资料,统计分析中国大陆中强地震归一化区域复发间隔,分析发现中国大陆中强地震活动兼具周期性和丛集性特点。采用对数正态分布与指数分布构建混合概率分布模型,通过最小二乘法拟合混合概率分布函数的最优参数。拟合结果的误差分析表明,混合概率分布模型更加符合中国大陆中强地震的活动特点。

     

  • 图  1  中国大陆1960年以来MS4.7以上地震目录的完整性分析[18]

    (a)震级—序号法给出的地震密度分布;(b)多统计方法定量分析给出的最小完整性震级Mc的时间变化

    Figure  1.  Completeness analysis of earthquake catalog (MS≥4.7) in mainland China since 1960[18]

    (a) Seismic rate for different magnitudes in the index domain;(b) Completeness thresholds Mc estimated by three statistical methods

    图  2  删除余震前后的累积频次曲线对比

    Figure  2.  Cumulative frequency curve before and after declustering

    图  3  1960年以来中国大陆中强地震 (MS5.0—6.5)归一化区域复发间隔频率直方图

    Figure  3.  Normalized frequency histogram of moderate-strong (MS5.0—6.5) earthquake recurrence intervals in mainland China since 1960

    图  4  中国大陆历史大地震归一化复发间隔频率直方图[10]

    Figure  4.  Normalized frequency histogram of large earthquake recurrence intervals in mainland China[10]

    图  5  1960年以来中国大陆中强地震(MS5.0—6.5)归一化区域复发间隔频率直方图及CDF曲线

    Figure  5.  Normalized frequency histogram and cumulative density function curve of moderate-strong (MS5.0—6.5) earthquake recurrence intervals in mainland China since 1960 and the curve of CDF

    图  6  混合分布累积概率密度函数拟合结果。黑线为基于数据绘制的累积概率密度函数(CDF)曲线,绿线为拟合的CDF曲线,红线为基于估算得到的参数绘制的概率密度函数(PDF)曲线,相应的对数正态分布和指数分布函数曲线分别用黑色线段虚线和点虚线表示,蓝色柱状图为归一化区域地震复发间隔数据的统计频率直方图

    Figure  6.  Cumulative density function fitting result of hybrid distribution model. The solid black line is the estimated cumulative density function (CDF) curve based on recurrence data, the green solid line is the best-fitting CDF curve, the red line is the best-fitting probability density function (PDF) curve, the black dashed and dotted lines show the lognormal and exponential distribution functions, respectively. The blue histogram is the normalized frequency histogram of earthquake recurrence intervals

    图  7  对数正态分布累积概率密度函数拟合结果。黑线为基于数据绘制的累积概率密度函数(CDF)曲线,绿线为拟合的CDF曲线,红线为基于估算得到的参数绘制的概率密度函数(PDF)曲线,蓝色柱状图为归一化区域地震复发间隔数据的统计频率直方图

    Figure  7.  Cumulative density function fitting result of lognormal distribution. The solid black line is the estimated cumulative density function (CDF) curve based on recurrence data, the green solid line is the best-fitting CDF curve, the red line is the best-fitting probability density function (PDF) curve, the blue histogram is the normalized frequency histogram of earthquake recurrence intervals

    图  8  指数分布累积概率密度函数拟合结果。黑线为基于数据绘制的累积概率密度函数(CDF)曲线,绿线为拟合的CDF曲线,红线为基于估算得到的参数绘制的概率密度函数(PDF)曲线,蓝色柱状图为归一化区域地震复发间隔数据的统计频率直方图

    Figure  8.  Cumulative density function fitting result of exponential distribution. The solid black line is the estimated cumulative density function (CDF) curve based on recurrence data, the green solid line is the best-fitting CDF curve, the red line is the best-fitting probability density function (PDF) curve, the blue histogram is the normalized frequency histogram of earthquake recurrence intervals

    表  1  参数估算与拟合误差结果

    Table  1.   Results of estimated parameters and fitting error

    模型参数估计拟合误差
    混合分布a0.5690.00016
    μ0.291
    σ0.657
    λ4.291
    对数正态分布μ−0.5150.00157
    σ1.382
    指数分布λ1.0120.00132
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Nishenko S P,Buland R. A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1987,77(4):1382-1399
    [2] 闻学泽. 时间相依的活动断裂分段地震危险性评估及其问题[J]. 科学通报,1998,43(14):1457-1466 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.1998.14.001

    Wen X Z. Segmented seismic hazard assessment of time-dependent active faults and its problems[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,1998,43(14):1457-1466 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.1998.14.001
    [3] 闻学泽. 中国大陆活动断裂段破裂地震复发间隔的经验分布[J]. 地震学报,1999,21(6):616-622 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.1999.06.007

    Wen X Z. Distribution of empirical recurrence intervals of segment-rupturing earthquakes on active faults of the Chinese mainland[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,1999,21(6):616-622 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.1999.06.007
    [4] 王芃,邵志刚,刘琦,等. 基于多学科物理观测的地震概率预测方法在川滇地区的应用[J]. 地球物理学报,2019,62(9):3448-3463 doi: 10.6038/cjg2019M0359

    Wang P,Shao Z G,Liu Q,et al. Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes based on multidisciplinary physical observations and its application in Sichuan and Yunnan[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2019,62(9):3448-3463 doi: 10.6038/cjg2019M0359
    [5] 邓世广,周龙泉,马亚伟,等. 基于贝叶斯定理的地震危险性概率预测研究[J]. 中国地震,2019,35(1):1-13 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2019.01.001

    Deng S G,Zhou L Q,Ma Y W,et al. Research on probability prediction of earthquake risk based on Bayesian theorem[J]. Earthquake Research in China,2019,35(1):1-13 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2019.01.001
    [6] Savage J C. The uncertainty in earthquake conditional probabilities[J]. Geophysical Research Letters,1992,19(7):709-712 doi: 10.1029/92GL00544
    [7] 闻学泽. 鲜水河断裂带未来三十年内地震复发的条件概率[J]. 中国地震,1990,6(4):8-16

    Wen X Z. Conditional probabilities for the recurrence of earthquakes on the Xianshuihe fault zone within the coming three decades[J]. Earthquake Research in China,1990,6(4):8-16
    [8] 闻学泽. 活动断裂地震潜势的定量评估[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1995

    Wen X Z. Quantitative estimates of seismic potential on active faults[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1995
    [9] 张培震, 毛凤英. 活动断裂定量研究与中长期强地震危险性概率评价[M]//邓起东. 活动断裂研究(5). 北京: 地震出版社, 1996: 12-31

    Zhang P Z, Mao F Y. Active Faulting and fault specific probabilistic seismic hazard assessment[M]//Deng Q D. Research on active fault (5). Beijing: Seismological Press, 1996: 12-31
    [10] 甘卫军,刘百篪,黄雅虹. 板内大震原地准周期复发间隔的概率分布[J]. 西北地震学报,1999,21(1):7-16

    Gan W J,Liu B C,Huang Y H. Probability distribution of recurrence intervals of intraplate large earthquakes[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal,1999,21(1):7-16
    [11] 梅世蓉. 中国的地震活动性[J]. 地球物理学报,1960,9(1):1-19

    Mei S R. Seismicity in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,1960,9(1):1-19
    [12] 李钦祖,于利民,王吉易,等. 成组活动是中国大陆强地震的一个基本特点[J]. 地震学报,1994,16(1):11-17

    Li Q Z,Yu L M,Wang J Y,et al. Grouping occurrences and fundamental feature of strong earthquakes in Chinese mainland[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,1994,16(1):11-17
    [13] 李钦祖, 于利民, 王吉易, 等. 中国大陆强地震的成组活动和概率预报[J]. 中国科学(B辑), 1993, 23(5): 519-526

    Li Q Z, Yu L M, Wang J Y, et al. Grouping occurrences and probability prediction of the strong earthquakes in Chinese mainland. Science in China (Series B), 1993, 23(5): 519-526
    [14] 马禾青,赵卫明,任雪梅,等. 中国大陆地震成组活动特征统计分析[J]. 地震,2003,23(1):57-62 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3274.2003.01.010

    Ma H Q,Zhao W M,Ren X M,et al. Statistical analysis about features of seismic group activity in China’s continent[J]. Earthquake,2003,23(1):57-62 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3274.2003.01.010
    [15] 周龙泉,张晓东,刘杰. 基于中国大陆5级以上地震重复性的年度地震预测及其效能检验[J]. 中国地震,2006,22(3):311-320 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2006.03.012

    Zhou L Q,Zhang X D,Liu J. Annual earthquake prediction and scientific evaluation based on repeating of earthquake with M≥5.0 on the Chinese continent[J]. Earthquake Research in China,2006,22(3):311-320 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2006.03.012
    [16] 李姜一,周本刚. 中国东部中强地震潜在震源区地震复发概率分布[J]. 震灾防御技术,2016,11(1):1-10 doi: 10.11899/zzfy20160101

    Li J Y,Zhou B G. Recurrence interval probability distribution of moderate-strong earthquakes in potential seismic source of east China[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,2016,11(1):1-10 doi: 10.11899/zzfy20160101
    [17] 张秋文,张培震,王乘,等. 中国大陆若干地震构造带的地震准周期丛集复发行为[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,2002,22(1):56-62

    Zhang Q W,Zhang P Z,Wang C,et al. Quasi-periodically clustering earthquake recurrence in some seismotectonic belts of China continent[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,2002,22(1):56-62
    [18] 蒋长胜,吴忠良,庄建仓. 地震的“序列归属”问题与ETAS模型−以唐山序列为例[J]. 地球物理学报,2013,56(9):2971-2981 doi: 10.6038/cjg20130911

    Jiang C S,Wu Z L,Zhuang J C. ETAS model applied to the Earthquake-Sequence Association (ESA) problem:the Tangshan sequence[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2013,56(9):2971-2981 doi: 10.6038/cjg20130911
    [19] 李闽峰. 震害预测快速服务平台的模型与方法及一些相关理论的研究[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 2002

    Li M F. Study on models & approaches and some associated theories of rapid internet service of earthquake loss estimation[D]. Beijing: Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, 2002
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  227
  • HTML全文浏览量:  89
  • PDF下载量:  55
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-19
  • 修回日期:  2022-01-04
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-01-21

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司设计开发 百度统计