Monitoring variations of crustal media after the MS4.6 Ruichang-Yangxin earthquake by coda wave interferometry
-
摘要: 基于2011年瑞昌—阳新MS4.6地震序列事件波形及其观测报告,采用双差重定位法、波形互相关法和尾波干涉法,筛选出了同时被黄梅台和九江台记录且波形互相关系数≥0.920的两组重复地震对:D1(2011-09-11 05:44 ML2.3和2011-10-24 08:06 ML2.2)和D2(2011-09-18 07:06 ML2.8和2011-10-2408:06 ML2.2),发现瑞昌—阳新MS4.6地震后1.5个月内(2011-09-11—10-24)震源区S波早期尾波波速增加。
-
关键词:
- 瑞昌—阳新MS4.6地震 /
- 重复地震 /
- 尾波干涉法 /
- 地壳介质变化
Abstract: Based on the event waveform data and its observation report of the 2011 Ruichang-Yangxin MS4.6 earthquake sequence processed by the double-difference method, waveform cross-correlation and coda wave interferometry, two groups of repeating earthquakes (cc≥0.920, recorded by station Huangmei and station Jiujiang) can be obtained: D1 (2011-09-11 05:44 ML2.3 and 2011-10-24 08:06 ML2.2) and D2 (2011-09-18 07:06 ML2.8 and 2011-10-24 08:06 ML2.2). It could be found that the velocity of early S wave coda increased within 1.5 months (2011-09-11—10-24) in source region after the MS4.6 Ruichang-Yangxin earthquake. -
层数 1 2 3 4 5 6 深度/km 0—3 3—8 8—16 16—25 25—35 35+ vP/(km·s−1) 4.80 5.90 6.10 6.40 6.90 8.00 vS/(km·s−1) 2.80 3.45 3.57 3.62 3.98 4.42 表 2 MS4.6地震及双台记录重复地震对信息统计表
Table 2. Statistics of the MS4.6 earthquake and repeating earthquakes recorded by 2 stations
序号 发震时间 北纬/° 东经/° 深度/km 震级 时间间隔/d 水平间距/km 垂直间距/km D0 2011-09-10 23:20 29.713507 115.431649 9.6 MS4.6 − − − D1 2011-09-11 05:44 29.718791 115.446672 6.1 ML2.3 约43 0.5 0.2 2011-10-24 08:06 29.714347 115.442342 6.3 ML2.2 D2 2011-09-18 07:06 29.712360 115.441577 5.7 ML2.8 约36 0.1 0.6 2011-10-24 08:06 29.714347 115.442342 6.3 ML2.2 表 3 黄梅台和九江台记录的重复地震对S波早期尾波相对波速变化
Table 3. Variation of relative wave velocity of early S coda for repeating earthquakes at station HME and JIJ
台站 序号 事件1 事件2 相对波速变化 − D0 2011-09-10 23:20 − − 黄梅台(HME) D1 2011-09-11 05:44 2011-10-24 08:06 6.2883±0.264548‰ D2 2011-09-18 07:06 2011-10-24 08:06 4.7300±0.344116‰ 九江台(JIJ) D1 2011-09-11 05:44 2011-10-24 08:06 0.47348±0.139689‰ D2 2011-09-18 07:06 2011-10-24 08:06 5.2992±0.325297‰ 表 4 九江台降雨量和气压日平均值统计
Table 4. Daily average statistics of rainfall and pressure at station JIJ
年份 8月 9月 10月 11月 降雨量/mm 气压/hPa 降雨量/mm 气压/hPa 降雨量/mm 气压/hPa 降雨量/mm 气压/hPa 2010 6.1 1010.6 1.8 1011.9 5.8 1014.4 0.6 1014.9 2011 4.6 1007.2 3.0 1010.9 2.5 1015.1 2.1 1015.8 2012 7.8 1006.6 6.3 1012.5 3.4 1014.6 3.2 1013.5 -
[1] 董非非,邓辉,胡睿,等. 瑞昌—阳新MS4.6级地震序列震源位置及震源机制研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,2016,36(12):1047-1051Dong F F,Deng H,Hu R,et al. Study on source location and focal mechanism of Ruichang-Yangxin magnitude 4.6 earthquake sequence[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,2016,36(12):1047-1051 [2] Pandolfi D,Bean C J,Saccorotti G. Coda wave interferometric detection of seismic velocity changes associated with the 1999 M = 3.6 event at Mt. Vesuvius[J]. Geophysical Research Letters,2006,33(6):272-288 [3] 肖卓. 利用重复地震和尾波干涉技术监测地壳介质动态变化−以青藏高原周缘为例[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 2014Xiao Z. Monitoring dynamic variations of underground media by repeating earthquakes and coda wave interferometry: Application in the vicinity of Tibet Plateau[D]. Beijing: Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, China Earthquake Administration, 2014 [4] 汪建,向涯,杨亚运,等. 尾波干涉技术在2017年重庆武隆MS5.0地震后震源区地壳介质变化的应用[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2021,42(3):64-73 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2021.03.008Wang J,Xiang Y,Yang Y Y,et al. Application of coda wave interferometry in crustal variation in focal area after Chongqing Wulong MS5.0 earthquake in 2017[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,2021,42(3):64-73 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2021.03.008 [5] 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 国家测震台网数据备份中心. 国家测震台网地震波形数据[DB/OL]. [2021-10-30]. http://www.seisdmc.ac.cnData Management Centre of China National Seismic Network, Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration. Waveform data of China National Seismic Network[DB/OL]. [2021-10-30]. http://www.seisdmc.ac.cn [6] 郑秀芬, 欧阳飚, 张东宁, 等. “国家测震台网数据备份中心” 技术系统建设及其对汶川大地震研究的数据支撑[J]. 地球物理学报, 2009, 52(5): 1412-1417Zheng X F, Ouyang B, Zhang D N, et al. Technical system construction of Data Backup Centre for China Seismograph Network and the data support to researches on the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009, 52(5): 1412-1417 [7] Waldhauser F,Ellsworth W L. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm:Method and application to the Northern Hayward Fault,California[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2000,90(6):1353-1368 doi: 10.1785/0120000006 [8] 吕坚,曾文敬,谢祖军,等. 2011年9月10日瑞昌—阳新4.6级地震的震源破裂特征与区域强震危险性[J]. 地球物理学报,2012,55(11):3625-3633 doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.11.011Lü J,Zeng W J,Xie Z J,et al. Rupture characteristics of the MS4.6 Ruichang-Yangxin earthquake of Sep. 10,2011 and the strong earthquake risk in the region[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2012,55(11):3625-3633 doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.11.011 [9] 董非非,邓辉,郑斌,等. “重复地震”在江西省及邻区测震台网定位精度评价中的应用[J]. 华北地震科学,2016,34(2):73-78 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1375.2016.02.013Dong F F,Deng H,Zheng B,et al. Location accuracy estimating of the digital seismic network of Jiangxi Province and its adjacent areas using repeating events[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences,2016,34(2):73-78 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1375.2016.02.013 [10] Snieder R. Coda wave interferometry and the equilibration of energy in elastic media[J]. Physical Review E,2002,66(4):046615 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.046615 [11] Snieder R. The theory of coda wave interferometry[J]. Pure & Applied Geophysics,2006,163(2/3):455-473 [12] Payan C,Garnier V,Moysan J. Determination of nonlinear elastic constants and stress monitoring in concrete by coda waves analysis[J]. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering,2011,15(4):519-531 doi: 10.1080/19648189.2011.9693344 [13] Quazi A. An overview on the time delay estimate in active and passive systems for target localization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics,Speech,and Signal Processing,1981,29(3):527-533 doi: 10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163618 [14] Carter G C. Coherence and time delay estimation[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE,2005,75(2):236-255 [15] 张丽芬,姚运生,廖武林. 2011年MS4.6瑞昌—阳新地震的震源机制及发震构造探讨[J]. 地震地质,2013,35(2):290-299 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2013.02.008Zhang L F,Yao Y S,Liao W L. Focal mechanisms and seismogenic structures of the MS4.6 Ruichang-Yangxin earthquake of 2011[J]. Seismology and Geology,2013,35(2):290-299 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2013.02.008 [16] 汪建,杨亚运,马伟. 利用重复地震观测重庆武隆地区地壳介质变化[J]. 地震科学进展,2021,51(11):498-504Wang J,Yang Y Y,Ma W. Monitoring variation of crustal media in Wulong area of Chongqing Municipality by using repeating earthquakes[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences,2021,51(11):498-504 [17] 汪建,王同军,杨亚运,等. 利用重复地震观测重庆巫山地区地壳介质变化[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2018,39(6):16-22 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2018.06.003Wang J,Wang T J,Yang Y Y,et al. Monitoring crustal media variation in Wushan area of Chongqing Municipality by using repeated earthquakes[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,2018,39(6):16-22 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2018.06.003 [18] 肖卓,高原. 运用尾波干涉技术监测2014年盈江双震期间地壳介质状态的变化[J]. 地球物理学进展,2016,31(6):2421-2428 doi: 10.6038/pg20160609Xiao Z,Gao Y. Monitoring dynamic variations of crustal media during 2014 Yingjiang double earthquakes by coda wave interferometry[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2016,31(6):2421-2428 doi: 10.6038/pg20160609 [19] 刘志坤. 基于背景噪声的地下结构随时间变化监测和成像研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2014Liu Z K. Seismic velocities monitoring and imaging with ambient noise[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2014 [20] Xie J,Ritzwoller M H,Shen W,et al. Crustal radial anisotropy across Eastern Tibet and the Western Yangtze Craton[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,2013,118(8):4226-4252 [21] Martini F,Bean C J,Saccorotti G,et al. Seasonal cycles of seismic velocity variations detected using coda wave interferometry at Fogo volcano,So Miguel,Azores,during 2003—2004[J]. Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research,2009,181(3/4):231-246 [22] 徐亚飞. 利用气枪震源信号和背景噪声研究2016年呼图壁6.2级地震前后波速变化特征[D]. 兰州: 中国地震局兰州地震研究所, 2019Xu Y F. Study on the variation characteristics of wave velocity before and after the 2016 Hutubi M6.2 earthquake by using air gun source signal and background noise[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, 2019 -