zhenbo

ISSN 2096-7780 CN 10-1665/P

章逸, 周正华, 韩轶, 魏鑫. 地铁车站平面模型研究综述[J]. 地震科学进展 , 2022, (4): 145-153. DOI: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2021-076
引用本文: 章逸, 周正华, 韩轶, 魏鑫. 地铁车站平面模型研究综述[J]. 地震科学进展 , 2022, (4): 145-153. DOI: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2021-076
Zhang Yi, Zhou Zhenghua, Han Yi, Wei Xin. Review on the study of plane model of subway station[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 2022, (4): 145-153. DOI: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2021-076
Citation: Zhang Yi, Zhou Zhenghua, Han Yi, Wei Xin. Review on the study of plane model of subway station[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 2022, (4): 145-153. DOI: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2021-076

地铁车站平面模型研究综述

Review on the study of plane model of subway station

  • 摘要: 地下结构抗震研究是当今地震工程领域重要的研究方向之一。迄今为止,国内外学者在地铁车站结构地震响应研究中采取了原型观测、实验研究、理论分析等方法。随着计算机技术的长足发展,实验研究中的数值模拟方法为越来越多的学者所采用。为提高计算效率,通常简化计算模型,采用平面模型模拟地下车站结构。对二维模型和三维模型的计算结果差异目前已有大量研究,但少有学者对各结果差异进行系统性比较。本文对平面模型现有研究进行了简要和全面的回顾,并且对比分析了等效面积法、等代框架法、等效刚度法、等效刚度折减弹性模量法等方法的特点和不足,以加深人们对地下结构抗震研究方法的认识。

     

    Abstract: The seismic research of underground structures is one of the important research directions in the field of earthquake engineering today. Domestic and foreign scholars have adopted methods such as prototype observation, experimental research, and theoretical analysis in the study of subway station seismic response so far. With the rapid development of computer technology, numerical simulation methods in experimental research are adopted by more and more scholars. In order to shorten the calculation time and simplify the calculation model, the plane model is usually used for calculation. There have been lots of studies on the difference between the plane model and the space model, but few scholars have systematically compared the difference between the results. This article provides a brief and comprehensive review of existing research on plane models. In order to deepen people’s understanding of seismic research methods of underground structures, the characteristics and shortcomings of equivalent area method, equal frame method, equivalent stiffness method and equivalent stiffness reduction elastic modulus method are compared and analyzed.

     

/

返回文章
返回