zhenbo

ISSN 2096-7780 CN 10-1665/P

徐芳芳, 朱成林, 贾媛, 卢双苓. 东平台分量应变与体应变可靠性分析及特殊事件影响对比[J]. 地震科学进展 , 2023, 53(2): 86-92. DOI: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2022-080
引用本文: 徐芳芳, 朱成林, 贾媛, 卢双苓. 东平台分量应变与体应变可靠性分析及特殊事件影响对比[J]. 地震科学进展 , 2023, 53(2): 86-92. DOI: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2022-080
Xu Fangfang, Zhu Chenglin, Jia Yuan, Lu Shuangling. Reliability analysis of component strain and volume strain at Dongping seismic station and comparison of influence of special events[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 2023, 53(2): 86-92. DOI: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2022-080
Citation: Xu Fangfang, Zhu Chenglin, Jia Yuan, Lu Shuangling. Reliability analysis of component strain and volume strain at Dongping seismic station and comparison of influence of special events[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 2023, 53(2): 86-92. DOI: 10.19987/j.dzkxjz.2022-080

东平台分量应变与体应变可靠性分析及特殊事件影响对比

Reliability analysis of component strain and volume strain at Dongping seismic station and comparison of influence of special events

  • 摘要: 本文通过四分量自检、相对标定内精度分析对东平地震台YRY-4钻孔分量应变观测资料进行可靠性分析,并结合滑动相关性计算、潮汐因子内精度对2套仪器数据进行了对比,证明YRY-4钻孔分量应变2面应变相关性高,相关系数接近1,相对标定内精度高,与体应变数据整体趋势一致。2套仪器观测环境一致,运行稳定,数据正常可靠,但也存在降雨、场地干扰特殊时段曲线表现不一致的情况。针对2种特殊情况结合相关性计算、S变换进行了对比分析。结果表明,降雨时段,因钻孔条件差别较大,2套仪器数据相关性较差,接近0;场地干扰时段,2套仪器观测系统均受到影响,频率域同步出现干扰信号,影响数据曲线形态及潮汐因子精度,但2套仪器面应变相关性达0.91。综合分析,东平台钻孔应变仪与体应变2套仪器观测系统是可靠稳定的。

     

    Abstract: In this paper, the reliability analysis of the YRY-4 borehole component strain observation data at Dongping seismic station is carried out through the four-component self-check and the relative calibration internal accuracy analysis. The data of the two instruments are compared by combining the sliding correlation calculation and the internal accuracy of the tidal factor. It is proved that the two surface strain correlation of the YRY-4 borehole component strain is high, and the correlation coefficient is close to 1. The relative calibration internal accuracy is high, which is consistent with the overall trend of the volume strain data. The observation environment of the two instruments is consistent, and the operation is stable, the data are normal and reliable. However, there are also inconsistencies in the curves of rainfall and site interference in special periods. For the two special cases, compared by correlation calculation and S transform, the results show that, due to the large difference in drilling conditions, the correlation between the two instrument data during rainfall period is poor, close to 0. During the site interference period, the two observation systems were affected, and the interference signals appeared synchronously in the frequency domain, which affected the data curve shape and the accuracy of the tidal factor, but the strain correlation between the two instruments reached 0.91 during the interference period. Comprehensive analysis shows that the two sets of instrument observation systems of component strain and volume strain at Dongping seismic station are reliable and stable.

     

/

返回文章
返回